The Dark Knight Rises: Keysi does it again
Mon, Jul 23 2012 06:25
| krav maga, keysi, martial arts, film review, christian bale, fighting, street fight, fighters, KFM, tom hardy, self defence, batman
| Permalink
This was always going to be my “film event of the year” the trilogy Chirstopher Nolan has masterminded sees it’s third installment crash on to screens with hype, controversy and just a little bit jaded cynicism murmuring away in some quarters which it answers at a canter.
For me, I’m not much a comic book fan, but Batman was always my favourite by a long chalk. The other two films took something not easily done and nailed it. Blending the fantasy of caped crusaders, sexy women and a life of danger and intrigue and not falling squarely into clichéd parody should be applauded. While I’m not here to review the film as a whole, suffice to say it makes a bold claim as part of trilogy which rivals Jackson’s LOTR venture.
This ‘reboot’ of Batman first landed in 2005 and for me only one other cinematic example of blending realistic martial arts with acting existed. All others before and since the Bourne films (oddly another trilogy, soon to be quadrilogy) had been put under a shadow of scrutiny when it comes to offering up audiences acceptable hand-to-hand combat for screen. Not only did Bourne take on-screen fight scenes and make you question the word ‘scene’ but they showed that our tendency to assign ‘hero’ status to a character doesn’t need to be sated like most childish urges by making theses characters immortal, flawless and untouchable when it came to the actual fighting.
To do that with the excellent but somewhat everyman that is Matt Damon was a landmark for me. It showed when Daniel Craig became the new Bond and then Bale as Batman showed that “real” just got a whole lot well, “realer” in Hollywood. Whatever the “style” it’s important to remember that stuntmen, actors, fight choreographers etc are all limited, by skill sets, resources and more importantly presentation.
To do that with the excellent but somewhat everyman that is Matt Damon was a landmark for me. It showed when Daniel Craig became the new Bond and then Bale as Batman showed that “real” just got a whole lot well, “realer” in Hollywood. Whatever the “style” it’s important to remember that stuntmen, actors, fight choreographers etc are all limited, by skill sets, resources and more importantly presentation.
When people remark they want to “fight like that” what they usually mean is, I want to be successful – copying ‘moves’ from a film is not high on my list of training methods. What these forays of my passion crossing over into the mainstream world does though, is question not only what is possible for these professionals honing a craft; but also what is possible in my own training.
The Batman films use the Keysi Fighting Method (KFM) as devised by two stuntmen who give vague reasons and recollections of their credentials when it comes to offering an art of sorts up. I know of one club locally, and anecdotal evidence of their training worries me. Putting a new student in at the deep end should be done to benefit the student, not everyone else. All KFM’s claims about being “solely” for the street should be scrutinised. Even Wing Tsun acknowledges, embraces and explores the history and heritage of the art as a cultural endeavour. Selling what you do, often involves managing the expectations of potential students – with this film behind them the KFM boys might need a bigger damp cloth right now.
What we see in The Dark Knight Rises is a stoic but still impressive continuation of the action scenes which have helped make it such a landmark set of films. Batman has after all still not shed the Adam West days of high camp for most people, for the films to steer well clear of it is logical. Instead we see fight scenes where Batman still utilises gadgetry and the advantage of surprise but ultimately he has to wade in and go toe to toe with adversaries to get the job done.
You can see why the Bourne and Bond films have so much in common beyond alliteration with our hero. To really make people believe these days you have to show them, almost unflinchingly that fighting is something visceral and animalistic, a necessary state and capability within everyone. While I have my doubts about KFM based on their own literature and the fact it seems very much “for screen” it does have a certain base which makes this film and Batman utterly captivating.
The physiques of Bale and Batman and Hardy as Bane are truly exceptional. As athletes they are clearly well coached and well drilled. The fitness, nutrition and physical training aspects of Hollywood, is a big industry in its own right. Hardy has already delved into MMA and clearly has the physical ability to play such roles. Here he ups his game. There is one scene where Bane and Batman go toe to amidst a crowd of people which really could have been a turkey. To give an audience that much visual stimulus and keep us engaged on the swinging fists, forearms and bone crushing hostility of the fight was exceptional.
This is where KFM comes into its own. I often think it looks like Krav Maga. It’s quick but unsubtle, smashing and carving into opponents offers the best reward for audiences. The hammer fists, elbows and repeated blunt blows to the same targets offer a strategically valuable insight into ‘real fighting’ but lack the realism of tissue, blood and bone trauma for a film aiming squarely at the young male market and in need of upholding it’s 12A rating. For me there is nothing new in the technique or approach. There are no secrets or hidden gems I haven’t used a thousand times myself. That’s why I remain a little unsure about KFM beyond entertainment. It looks great, but it doesn’t seem to be much more than the basics of self defence executed with a visual flourish and Hollywood’s eye.
The film itself is exceptional. It delivered for me. The action likewise, but before running off to don your cape and ape your hero take the time to ensure you separate fiction from reality. The likely from the possible, and check that what stuntmen have given the world of cinema shouldn’t remain there and there alone.
The eternal question: Part II
Thu, Dec 22 2011 10:48
| MMA, bjj, martial arts, muay thai, www.amaclub.org.uk, EWTO, martial arts Altrincham, Bruce Lee, kickboxing, self defence
| Permalink
Yesterday I wrote about the eternal dilemma of your martial arts “working” – a topic as grand and broad as this deserves more than a simple post. Those of you who read part one will know my views on the art being only a small part of the equation. Today I want to talk about the pitfalls and the benefits of cross-training.
Cross-training doesn’t refer to the gym machine of the same name but actually training in different arts, styles and more importantly ranges. Wing Tsun’s most famous son is undoubtedly Bruce Lee. Lee was famous for many things but his most appealing influence was his approach to breaking down barriers. Cultural and stylistically he did his best to ask questions and answer them. This was an admirable and brave decision given the cultural context of studying martial arts in 1970s Hong Kong.
Martial arts are riddled with egos, paranoia and mistrust towards not just other arts but other lineages within their own art. It is a sad, but somewhat understandable frailty of human nature.
Myself, having trained with various masters in different arts I like to think I’ve never shied away from facing up to the limitations of what I know and what I can do. Lead by my interests I have always complimented my Wing Tsun base with striking arts such as Muay Thai and Kickboxing – partly due to my physique being suited to them, partly because I simply really enjoy the contrast of pad-work and exercise with the methodical approach of WT, and partly because I wanted to see what these “simpler” arts have and do not have.
The answers were always enlightening. With a ‘white belt’ mentality I always try to approach a new training environment as best I can. I recommend this approach where possible. Throw away all you “know” whilst training and reassemble the pieces later in your own time. The big fear for people is that no longer being the top dog or even someone of average proficiency in the room can destroy all confidence. Being wailed on by guys with less overall experience but many more hours in your new art is a hurdle you must jump if you want to take away more than just bruises and worry.
I am always very impressed when a new recruit joins AMAC with this attitude, especially if they stay for any length of time. Therefore I try to embody this myself. But with this in mind what can another art be of benefit does it not simply distract and detract from time put in perfecting your primary skill set?
Yes and no.
For me it’s about satisfying my own curiosity. How can I as a teacher talk about other arts having never stepped into their world? I’ve seen it done suddenly often and respect for those martial artists is hard to come by. Secondly how can I say with any confidence that WT’s way is better? By training other things it helps me think about gaps in my own knowledge, faults in my own technique and lastly developing a greater understanding of my own body and how I use it.
This is crucial to the ideas I discussed in part one. The art I have studied changes as time goes by not just in content but in difficulty level too. Sometimes it gets harder, sometimes easier, by constantly appraising how effectively I can move and can learn new techniques allows me to use this knowledge when assessing whether my tan sau is as effective as it should be – it allows me to draw on a greater depth of knowledge knowing that other arts differ or concur with our way of thinking in WT.
This is important when trying new things out. Competition in martial sport springs immediately to mind. WT is well known for not fostering a culture or interest in competing. This is obviously down to the style and concepts behind WT being about disarming and maiming an assailant running at odds with the rules and nature of a sporting bout. While the MMA revolution may have made household names of various fighters and previously “unknown arts” such as Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and woke martial artists up to the possibilities and the panic of the ground game.
Even when I began training WT years ago the idea of fighting on the floor was snorted at derisively more often than not. Now it’s seen as an essential element for everyone. When one thinks about self defence though, the idea of rolling on concrete in the early hours of the morning as part of a self defence scenario seems somewhat ridiculous as well as dangerous. This is the main problem which causes so much angst.
Training should always be fit for purpose, if it doesn’t work, throw it away. If your experience and expectations are one of solely self defence, being king/queen of the triangles and chokes should be fairly way down the list. If like me you just love getting sweaty and up close and personal, they can become a fun and interesting exercise in the “what if” syndrome – mortal enemy of the “I don’t need” disease mentioned in part one.
People like to train in their comfort zone and as someone who loves and feel comfortable as a “striker” kicking and punching opponents until I can swarm all over them is my MO I feel the need to confess I don’t like the floor. It’s good for standing on and handy for bouncing other people off, but being down there isn’t for someone with long skinny monkey limbs like me. That’s why when the opportunity arises I get down there as quick and for as long as I can.
I know I can punch and kick – improving those is a simple case of reps now. I know my chi sau needs work, so I roll as much as I can. I know my form is always in need of polishing so I do that in my own time. But when there is floor space and a willing partner, ground-fighting is top of my list, because it’s still a whole new world to me.
So the next part of answering the eternal question is to ask you another one: what am I scared of doing in the training room? Go ahead and answer it in 2012.
Cross-training doesn’t refer to the gym machine of the same name but actually training in different arts, styles and more importantly ranges. Wing Tsun’s most famous son is undoubtedly Bruce Lee. Lee was famous for many things but his most appealing influence was his approach to breaking down barriers. Cultural and stylistically he did his best to ask questions and answer them. This was an admirable and brave decision given the cultural context of studying martial arts in 1970s Hong Kong.
Martial arts are riddled with egos, paranoia and mistrust towards not just other arts but other lineages within their own art. It is a sad, but somewhat understandable frailty of human nature.
Myself, having trained with various masters in different arts I like to think I’ve never shied away from facing up to the limitations of what I know and what I can do. Lead by my interests I have always complimented my Wing Tsun base with striking arts such as Muay Thai and Kickboxing – partly due to my physique being suited to them, partly because I simply really enjoy the contrast of pad-work and exercise with the methodical approach of WT, and partly because I wanted to see what these “simpler” arts have and do not have.
The answers were always enlightening. With a ‘white belt’ mentality I always try to approach a new training environment as best I can. I recommend this approach where possible. Throw away all you “know” whilst training and reassemble the pieces later in your own time. The big fear for people is that no longer being the top dog or even someone of average proficiency in the room can destroy all confidence. Being wailed on by guys with less overall experience but many more hours in your new art is a hurdle you must jump if you want to take away more than just bruises and worry.
I am always very impressed when a new recruit joins AMAC with this attitude, especially if they stay for any length of time. Therefore I try to embody this myself. But with this in mind what can another art be of benefit does it not simply distract and detract from time put in perfecting your primary skill set?
Yes and no.
For me it’s about satisfying my own curiosity. How can I as a teacher talk about other arts having never stepped into their world? I’ve seen it done suddenly often and respect for those martial artists is hard to come by. Secondly how can I say with any confidence that WT’s way is better? By training other things it helps me think about gaps in my own knowledge, faults in my own technique and lastly developing a greater understanding of my own body and how I use it.
This is crucial to the ideas I discussed in part one. The art I have studied changes as time goes by not just in content but in difficulty level too. Sometimes it gets harder, sometimes easier, by constantly appraising how effectively I can move and can learn new techniques allows me to use this knowledge when assessing whether my tan sau is as effective as it should be – it allows me to draw on a greater depth of knowledge knowing that other arts differ or concur with our way of thinking in WT.
This is important when trying new things out. Competition in martial sport springs immediately to mind. WT is well known for not fostering a culture or interest in competing. This is obviously down to the style and concepts behind WT being about disarming and maiming an assailant running at odds with the rules and nature of a sporting bout. While the MMA revolution may have made household names of various fighters and previously “unknown arts” such as Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and woke martial artists up to the possibilities and the panic of the ground game.
Even when I began training WT years ago the idea of fighting on the floor was snorted at derisively more often than not. Now it’s seen as an essential element for everyone. When one thinks about self defence though, the idea of rolling on concrete in the early hours of the morning as part of a self defence scenario seems somewhat ridiculous as well as dangerous. This is the main problem which causes so much angst.
Training should always be fit for purpose, if it doesn’t work, throw it away. If your experience and expectations are one of solely self defence, being king/queen of the triangles and chokes should be fairly way down the list. If like me you just love getting sweaty and up close and personal, they can become a fun and interesting exercise in the “what if” syndrome – mortal enemy of the “I don’t need” disease mentioned in part one.
People like to train in their comfort zone and as someone who loves and feel comfortable as a “striker” kicking and punching opponents until I can swarm all over them is my MO I feel the need to confess I don’t like the floor. It’s good for standing on and handy for bouncing other people off, but being down there isn’t for someone with long skinny monkey limbs like me. That’s why when the opportunity arises I get down there as quick and for as long as I can.
I know I can punch and kick – improving those is a simple case of reps now. I know my chi sau needs work, so I roll as much as I can. I know my form is always in need of polishing so I do that in my own time. But when there is floor space and a willing partner, ground-fighting is top of my list, because it’s still a whole new world to me.
So the next part of answering the eternal question is to ask you another one: what am I scared of doing in the training room? Go ahead and answer it in 2012.
The eternal question in martial arts
Wed, Dec 21 2011 09:57
| martial arts, fighting, www.amaclub.org.uk, street fight, Wing Tsun Kung fu, fighters, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
A fellow colleague was asked by his student recently “how do I know [Wing Tsun] really works?” It’s an interesting and age old question. Many people start learning a martial art for a multitude of reasons but usually they pick Wing Tsun because they want it to “work”. That is, it must defend them as easily and effectively as possible.
This mindset while not unreasonable is fraught with huge amounts of difficulties. If WT was easy everyone would do it. If WT was all you needed everyone would be invincible. As a teacher juggling your students’ expectations with their needs and the needs of everyone else in the room is the kind of multi-tasking that takes heroic amounts of effort and focus.
Sometimes (and only sometimes) it is necessary to overwhelm a student to the point where what they do doesn’t “work”, so they can feel the limitations and see their potential to improve and build something much better. Usually a better understanding of WT and a better version of how they employ the art is the aim and end result.
It’s not something you should do often but it can be a hugely beneficial experience which pulls people out of a rut or pushes them over the next plateau into a place where they can progress. That said, for the 99% of training time how do you show a martial art is beneficial to a student?
The answer is honestly, you can’t. You can demonstrate how it works for you, for your students, for half the world but that’s of little relevance if you can’t help someone see how they can share in that experience. Often this is the subject of selling yourself, your club, and your art to someone on their first or second class – but business needs aside, your club needs fresh blood as often as possible. Convincing people of the benefits of WT is essential.
So what really is it about Wing Tsun that works? Well it’s quite simple it’s the execution of it by someone fit enough, well educated enough and committed enough to practice and perfect it’s simple, but hard won rewards.
Whatever art you choose is only a fraction of the equation. The investment must also be made of your time, your patience and your openness to really succeed. Some arts are clearly better than others, but that doesn’t mean they are more valid than others. Being able to fight is innate you have to want it and be prepared to do what the other guy won’t. That applies to techniques as well as training.
Society teaches us from a young age to resist all urges to fight, but as animals it’s in there and teasing that out as well as combining it with the right concepts of martial arts is essential and this is one of WT’s cornerstones. As arts go, WT has very sophisticated and effective ideas underpinning what it is and what it does. That’s the crux of what makes it so good.
Like any art worth its salt it allows you to be injured, weaker, slower and less athletic than an opponent and still overcome. All of those natural advantages can be overcome with the ideas and by proxy the techniques concealed in the forms and training of WT. The mistake too many make is the “I don’t need…” syndrome.
Dismissing strength, fitness, diet, looking after yourself etc in the belief that WT alone is enough is the fundamental flaw of someone just waiting to get an all expenses trip to A&E. While you don’t need to be a world class athlete to be able to defend yourself, making the effort to train your body and equip with the capacity to perform every technique to its fullest potential is something anyone looking to really understand any art has to embrace.
The pasty runt with a pot belly that hides behind chi shields and bluster is no better than the witch-doctor of old. Passing off tradition and superstition as fact is still rife in some dark corners of the martial arts universe. People are wiser and more educated now just by dipping into the media coverage, youtube videos and forums that are everywhere these days.
So how do we know our art works? Short of taking the Tyler Durden approach and provoking strangers on a regular basis we must look to our own training and ask “am I making it work?” How often does a student ignore our advice as teachers? How often as students do us teachers think we know better? Humility is the key and honesty is the open door you have to walk through to get there.
Through training you can develop your own techniques and ideas and reinforce your learning. By slowly ramping up the intensity between you and your partner you can push techniques further and see how they work, illuminating your own understanding. But until that day comes where true aggression and an attack comes you won’t know how you will fare in any given fight, you will also learn how much of your art you have understood and taken on board.
Even the world champions of old know that you can lose, no matter who you are and some days it just isn’t your day. That isn’t a reflection on the art the art is merely a set of tools. How you use them is no reflection on the toolmaker after all.
This mindset while not unreasonable is fraught with huge amounts of difficulties. If WT was easy everyone would do it. If WT was all you needed everyone would be invincible. As a teacher juggling your students’ expectations with their needs and the needs of everyone else in the room is the kind of multi-tasking that takes heroic amounts of effort and focus.
Sometimes (and only sometimes) it is necessary to overwhelm a student to the point where what they do doesn’t “work”, so they can feel the limitations and see their potential to improve and build something much better. Usually a better understanding of WT and a better version of how they employ the art is the aim and end result.
It’s not something you should do often but it can be a hugely beneficial experience which pulls people out of a rut or pushes them over the next plateau into a place where they can progress. That said, for the 99% of training time how do you show a martial art is beneficial to a student?
The answer is honestly, you can’t. You can demonstrate how it works for you, for your students, for half the world but that’s of little relevance if you can’t help someone see how they can share in that experience. Often this is the subject of selling yourself, your club, and your art to someone on their first or second class – but business needs aside, your club needs fresh blood as often as possible. Convincing people of the benefits of WT is essential.
So what really is it about Wing Tsun that works? Well it’s quite simple it’s the execution of it by someone fit enough, well educated enough and committed enough to practice and perfect it’s simple, but hard won rewards.
Whatever art you choose is only a fraction of the equation. The investment must also be made of your time, your patience and your openness to really succeed. Some arts are clearly better than others, but that doesn’t mean they are more valid than others. Being able to fight is innate you have to want it and be prepared to do what the other guy won’t. That applies to techniques as well as training.
Society teaches us from a young age to resist all urges to fight, but as animals it’s in there and teasing that out as well as combining it with the right concepts of martial arts is essential and this is one of WT’s cornerstones. As arts go, WT has very sophisticated and effective ideas underpinning what it is and what it does. That’s the crux of what makes it so good.
Like any art worth its salt it allows you to be injured, weaker, slower and less athletic than an opponent and still overcome. All of those natural advantages can be overcome with the ideas and by proxy the techniques concealed in the forms and training of WT. The mistake too many make is the “I don’t need…” syndrome.
Dismissing strength, fitness, diet, looking after yourself etc in the belief that WT alone is enough is the fundamental flaw of someone just waiting to get an all expenses trip to A&E. While you don’t need to be a world class athlete to be able to defend yourself, making the effort to train your body and equip with the capacity to perform every technique to its fullest potential is something anyone looking to really understand any art has to embrace.
The pasty runt with a pot belly that hides behind chi shields and bluster is no better than the witch-doctor of old. Passing off tradition and superstition as fact is still rife in some dark corners of the martial arts universe. People are wiser and more educated now just by dipping into the media coverage, youtube videos and forums that are everywhere these days.
So how do we know our art works? Short of taking the Tyler Durden approach and provoking strangers on a regular basis we must look to our own training and ask “am I making it work?” How often does a student ignore our advice as teachers? How often as students do us teachers think we know better? Humility is the key and honesty is the open door you have to walk through to get there.
Through training you can develop your own techniques and ideas and reinforce your learning. By slowly ramping up the intensity between you and your partner you can push techniques further and see how they work, illuminating your own understanding. But until that day comes where true aggression and an attack comes you won’t know how you will fare in any given fight, you will also learn how much of your art you have understood and taken on board.
Even the world champions of old know that you can lose, no matter who you are and some days it just isn’t your day. That isn’t a reflection on the art the art is merely a set of tools. How you use them is no reflection on the toolmaker after all.
Stepping In and Staying Out of it.
Sat, Oct 8 2011 06:39
| fighting, violence, street fight, fighters, self defence
| Permalink
In the last few years I’ve moved into working in two seemingly different arenas populated with people who both have a lot in common; security guards and teachers. You may furrow your brow at this but bear with me.
‘Bouncers’ as we unfairly like to call them and teachers both have one fundamental issue in common when at work – safety. Not just the safety of ourselves but of other people. People who; are often smaller than we are (but definitely not always), emotionally fragile and potentially volatile. Whether drunk on alcohol or puberty, those in our care hold one common threat over our heads. The real but often overplayed threat of unpredictable and sometimes violent behaviour towards their peers, their surroundings and us!
What can one do? The policy of your employers can often differ wildly from that of the law in Great Britain. Much to my own annoyance the fear of litigation from those who cause problems, instead of the protection of those expected to deal with it seems to dominate the mind of them upstairs all too often.
Practically if people begin to fight in front of you the smart move seems to be to keep a wide berth, but if you have by your role a duty of care, that’s not always practical or possible. As a person with a certain inferred authority in the club or the classroom onlookers often turn their gaze to you to end trouble confidently, competently and in time.
My first consideration is to scan the horizon, know your surroundings and what you’re getting into. I’ve seen and heard of plenty of ‘white knights’ getting a good kicking for poking their nose into what they thought was a fight but was more a heated argument.
You need to understand who is involved, where they are in relation to you and who is in what danger at that given moment (you included). Your first mechanism of control is your voice. A commanding voice and direct commands can be powerful.
When people descend into a rage particularly a violent one they regress into mere animals their humanity is pocketed away and they should be treated as such. Like dogs a stern short command can provoke an obedient reaction in people. The word “Stop!” at the correct volume with intent can often cause people to do just that and stop in their tracks, maybe even pausing for thought and deflating the momentum of vicious intent they’ve blown themselves up into.
If you’re feeling oddly sceptical yet brave try shouting it suddenly in a public space with a crowd and notice that almost everyone will at least acknowledge the verbal command to some degree. Even if it is only expressed by them suddenly peering at you like you’re deranged. We cannot help but to respond even non-verbally with a turn of the head or body, it’s conditioned into us almost from birth.
The next step is to move as quickly and powerfully as you can towards the incident. This does not mean into it but just towards it so you are at a safe but workable distance to control the situation.
The next decision you must then make is whether to make any kind of contact with those involved. Typically the situation will involve two people one the aggressor and one the victim (this term should not be as morally loaded as it is, they might have started it after all).
What you need to be looking for here is typically “animal behaviour”. Are they actually fighting or merely sizing each other up? In nature animals will open their mouths, spread claws, arms and wings to show off their size and potential for doing damage. Often the spectacle of intimidation is enough for most to avoid coming to blows in what may potentially be a deadly situation.
Humans are no different. We evolved to kill and maim just like any other beast. Look and listen but don’t focus on what is being said. We all talk shit when adrenaline kicks in and I’m not ashamed to say I’m no different.
Observe how both people move and what they are actually doing, a good fighter will predict an opponent’s move because he sees the step or feint before the technique. He doesn’t wait for it to belt him in the mouth before making a call. This is a skill anyone breaking up a fight needs to some degree.
Often adolescents and partygoers alike are actually waiting for someone else to break up the fight before it gets going. It preserves their ego if they showed gameness but were prevented from actually engaging because of an external agent.
Take the example of the Saturday Night Neanderthal being held back by his tiny girlfriend imploring him “leave it, ee’s not wurth it!” It’s possible his companion is the fight equivalent of Moses to his Red Sea, but unlikely. If you want to kill the other bloke you always find a way to get a crack at doing it in my experience.
Potentially by your presence and use of authority a situation may disperse there and then but what if it doesn’t? There is no shame in not getting in there, too often people do a “white knight” and end up needing saving and or stitches themselves. I quite enjoy it, I won’t lie. But I have both the ego and flaw of feeling comfortable around flying fists etc.
Do not feel you need to morph into Bruce Lee and kick ass. There’s nothing wrong with trying to limit a horrible situation to involving just two people instead of twenty or worse. Using your voice and keeping others at bay whilst sending someone to seek help from colleagues is both sensible and effective.
Don’t be scared to let them tire each other out too. Sometimes a scuffle while unpleasant is not that serious. Once they’re both knackered you can pull them apart relatively easily.
But I can sense I’m dancing around the big anxiety, the massive ‘what if’ of you getting your hands dirty and physically separating people? Well let’s start by saying there’s no secret choke hold, debilitating but non-lethal strike that bouncers and teachers can use like some kung fu magic wand. If there was I’d have wasted my time typing all this out thus far.
What you must remember is there is at least one and by now, probably two massive forces coming together through fear, instinct and aggression – stepping in the middle of that is idiocy. Getting punched by two people at the same time generally hurts, if they’re not aiming for you it always hurts a lot more. Sod’s law perhaps.
Pick one, doesn’t matter who, as long as you feel comfortable that you can move them and do just that. Take one of the combatants out of the equation. Drag them or push them clear trying to make sure it’s not off a ledge, into a road, a solid object or anyone else. You’d be surprised how effective this can be if done correctly. The other person has no one to attack so the fight ceases and normality can begin to filter back into the room.
This needs to be combined with verbal prompts “Stop! Come here! Stay there!” etc as is appropriate. Actions speak louder than words but using both makes a right din.
Now there is a reasonable chance at this point you may get hit either on purpose or accidentally. Sorry. But you can worry about that afterwards. If you’ve jumped in, best start swimming. Distance or lack of it is your friend here. The closer you are the less distance their flailing limbs can accelerate over before crashing into you. That means for all you non physicists that they can’t hit you with as much force.
Again this comes with the disclaimer that you must pick an angle that keeps you away from errant blows where possible. Use their fixation with the other person to your advantage and ‘blindside’ them. Walk in on an angle where they don’t see you until you already have hold of their shoulders and are levering them out of harm’s way.
Don’t go for some complicated finger lock of doom, grab the torso particularly the shoulders and manipulate their centre of mass so that they have no choice but to step with you. Practice on some if you can and you’ll see what I mean.
With those pesky lawyers in mind I wouldn’t focus on the throat, the face or anything which might come off or snap in a struggle. Something big and manageable is the best bet in the heat of the moment.
Once the threat of violence has been dissolved you must conflict manage the hell out of the room. Let one of the combatants leave, its best if they aren’t together in case they are like Rocky and set on churning out sequels. The higher authorities can deal with chasing down people if necessary. Where you can let those involved be escorted away to give statements and face punishment etc.
Your first priority is to yourself and the onlookers, returning the room to normal literally and figuratively is tough. The physical effects of adrenaline can take a while to subside. But it’s important you don’t collapse into a gibbering wreck – not immediately you might have homework to set or a turn on checking the bogs to do.
As soon as you can write a report and get witnesses to do the same. Get as many facts down on paper as possible. It clears you of any accusation and wrongdoing and allows the mess to be sorted quicker if those investigating can present as many facts as possible.
It may surprise you to know that in my view martial technique and skill is not important in these scenarios it’s intelligence and presence of mind to take swift and affirmative action which saves the day. Do what you can and what you know which will help.
Obviously I’m speaking very generally but if you have specific questions, scenarios or ideas you’d like me to cover please let me know. I’d be happy to!
‘Bouncers’ as we unfairly like to call them and teachers both have one fundamental issue in common when at work – safety. Not just the safety of ourselves but of other people. People who; are often smaller than we are (but definitely not always), emotionally fragile and potentially volatile. Whether drunk on alcohol or puberty, those in our care hold one common threat over our heads. The real but often overplayed threat of unpredictable and sometimes violent behaviour towards their peers, their surroundings and us!
What can one do? The policy of your employers can often differ wildly from that of the law in Great Britain. Much to my own annoyance the fear of litigation from those who cause problems, instead of the protection of those expected to deal with it seems to dominate the mind of them upstairs all too often.
Practically if people begin to fight in front of you the smart move seems to be to keep a wide berth, but if you have by your role a duty of care, that’s not always practical or possible. As a person with a certain inferred authority in the club or the classroom onlookers often turn their gaze to you to end trouble confidently, competently and in time.
My first consideration is to scan the horizon, know your surroundings and what you’re getting into. I’ve seen and heard of plenty of ‘white knights’ getting a good kicking for poking their nose into what they thought was a fight but was more a heated argument.
You need to understand who is involved, where they are in relation to you and who is in what danger at that given moment (you included). Your first mechanism of control is your voice. A commanding voice and direct commands can be powerful.
When people descend into a rage particularly a violent one they regress into mere animals their humanity is pocketed away and they should be treated as such. Like dogs a stern short command can provoke an obedient reaction in people. The word “Stop!” at the correct volume with intent can often cause people to do just that and stop in their tracks, maybe even pausing for thought and deflating the momentum of vicious intent they’ve blown themselves up into.
If you’re feeling oddly sceptical yet brave try shouting it suddenly in a public space with a crowd and notice that almost everyone will at least acknowledge the verbal command to some degree. Even if it is only expressed by them suddenly peering at you like you’re deranged. We cannot help but to respond even non-verbally with a turn of the head or body, it’s conditioned into us almost from birth.
The next step is to move as quickly and powerfully as you can towards the incident. This does not mean into it but just towards it so you are at a safe but workable distance to control the situation.
The next decision you must then make is whether to make any kind of contact with those involved. Typically the situation will involve two people one the aggressor and one the victim (this term should not be as morally loaded as it is, they might have started it after all).
What you need to be looking for here is typically “animal behaviour”. Are they actually fighting or merely sizing each other up? In nature animals will open their mouths, spread claws, arms and wings to show off their size and potential for doing damage. Often the spectacle of intimidation is enough for most to avoid coming to blows in what may potentially be a deadly situation.
Humans are no different. We evolved to kill and maim just like any other beast. Look and listen but don’t focus on what is being said. We all talk shit when adrenaline kicks in and I’m not ashamed to say I’m no different.
Observe how both people move and what they are actually doing, a good fighter will predict an opponent’s move because he sees the step or feint before the technique. He doesn’t wait for it to belt him in the mouth before making a call. This is a skill anyone breaking up a fight needs to some degree.
Often adolescents and partygoers alike are actually waiting for someone else to break up the fight before it gets going. It preserves their ego if they showed gameness but were prevented from actually engaging because of an external agent.
Take the example of the Saturday Night Neanderthal being held back by his tiny girlfriend imploring him “leave it, ee’s not wurth it!” It’s possible his companion is the fight equivalent of Moses to his Red Sea, but unlikely. If you want to kill the other bloke you always find a way to get a crack at doing it in my experience.
Potentially by your presence and use of authority a situation may disperse there and then but what if it doesn’t? There is no shame in not getting in there, too often people do a “white knight” and end up needing saving and or stitches themselves. I quite enjoy it, I won’t lie. But I have both the ego and flaw of feeling comfortable around flying fists etc.
Do not feel you need to morph into Bruce Lee and kick ass. There’s nothing wrong with trying to limit a horrible situation to involving just two people instead of twenty or worse. Using your voice and keeping others at bay whilst sending someone to seek help from colleagues is both sensible and effective.
Don’t be scared to let them tire each other out too. Sometimes a scuffle while unpleasant is not that serious. Once they’re both knackered you can pull them apart relatively easily.
But I can sense I’m dancing around the big anxiety, the massive ‘what if’ of you getting your hands dirty and physically separating people? Well let’s start by saying there’s no secret choke hold, debilitating but non-lethal strike that bouncers and teachers can use like some kung fu magic wand. If there was I’d have wasted my time typing all this out thus far.
What you must remember is there is at least one and by now, probably two massive forces coming together through fear, instinct and aggression – stepping in the middle of that is idiocy. Getting punched by two people at the same time generally hurts, if they’re not aiming for you it always hurts a lot more. Sod’s law perhaps.
Pick one, doesn’t matter who, as long as you feel comfortable that you can move them and do just that. Take one of the combatants out of the equation. Drag them or push them clear trying to make sure it’s not off a ledge, into a road, a solid object or anyone else. You’d be surprised how effective this can be if done correctly. The other person has no one to attack so the fight ceases and normality can begin to filter back into the room.
This needs to be combined with verbal prompts “Stop! Come here! Stay there!” etc as is appropriate. Actions speak louder than words but using both makes a right din.
Now there is a reasonable chance at this point you may get hit either on purpose or accidentally. Sorry. But you can worry about that afterwards. If you’ve jumped in, best start swimming. Distance or lack of it is your friend here. The closer you are the less distance their flailing limbs can accelerate over before crashing into you. That means for all you non physicists that they can’t hit you with as much force.
Again this comes with the disclaimer that you must pick an angle that keeps you away from errant blows where possible. Use their fixation with the other person to your advantage and ‘blindside’ them. Walk in on an angle where they don’t see you until you already have hold of their shoulders and are levering them out of harm’s way.
Don’t go for some complicated finger lock of doom, grab the torso particularly the shoulders and manipulate their centre of mass so that they have no choice but to step with you. Practice on some if you can and you’ll see what I mean.
With those pesky lawyers in mind I wouldn’t focus on the throat, the face or anything which might come off or snap in a struggle. Something big and manageable is the best bet in the heat of the moment.
Once the threat of violence has been dissolved you must conflict manage the hell out of the room. Let one of the combatants leave, its best if they aren’t together in case they are like Rocky and set on churning out sequels. The higher authorities can deal with chasing down people if necessary. Where you can let those involved be escorted away to give statements and face punishment etc.
Your first priority is to yourself and the onlookers, returning the room to normal literally and figuratively is tough. The physical effects of adrenaline can take a while to subside. But it’s important you don’t collapse into a gibbering wreck – not immediately you might have homework to set or a turn on checking the bogs to do.
As soon as you can write a report and get witnesses to do the same. Get as many facts down on paper as possible. It clears you of any accusation and wrongdoing and allows the mess to be sorted quicker if those investigating can present as many facts as possible.
It may surprise you to know that in my view martial technique and skill is not important in these scenarios it’s intelligence and presence of mind to take swift and affirmative action which saves the day. Do what you can and what you know which will help.
Obviously I’m speaking very generally but if you have specific questions, scenarios or ideas you’d like me to cover please let me know. I’d be happy to!
News Flash
Fri, Aug 26 2011 12:41
| seminar, kung fu, martial arts, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, Bruce Lee, kids martial arts, self defence
| Permalink
We've been a bit quiet on the blogging front but no news is good news as they say, and there's a lot to be going on with here at AMAC!
A Young Bruce Lee training with the late Great Grandmaster Yip Man in poon sau.
Firstly our kids classes have taken off to great success. To get your child enrolled before places fill up simply turn up for a FREE class of your choice. Try it with no obligation to see what parents and kids alike have been talking about.
Tomorrow morning we have a fantastic Bank Holiday Kung Fu seminar - two days of expert tuition and a chance to up your skills, knowledge and understanding in a fun and intensive setting. To take part simply come along! Even if you've never tried martial arts before - it's no problem.
Lastly Altrincham Martial Arts Club is delighted to announce it's return to the EWTO. Headed by the inspirational Grandmaster Keith Kernspecht we are the only club in the North West teaching authentic and genuine Wing Tsun Kung Fu. Accept no imitations. If you want to learn from the same lineage as Bruce Lee we're the club with the real deal kung fu.
So what are you waiting for? We've been busy, time for you to get busy too!
Losing face means nothing
Wed, Jun 15 2011 01:24
| martial arts, conflict resolution, psychology, fighting, street fight, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
Last night as I was pulling into my home I was abused and threatened. As I was turning into the gate that leads to my car parking space a shout and crash met me just next to my driver's window. I looked down to see a middle aged man picking himself and his bike off the road.
He'd bolted up from behind me on the wrong side of the road, despite me being stationary and indicating to turn right he was incredulous as to how I'd dare to nearly knock him off a bike he was riding too fast, without a helmet and weaving around me, on my driver's side.
I wound down my window and immediately any concern I felt was met with aggression. Insults were traded and the posturing of "get out the car I want a word with you" soon followed. After pointing out the man was on the wrong side of the road sneaking up on my blindside he then decided he actually "wanted a word" with me because I had apparnetly "nearly put [him] in the kerb" somewhere vaguely down the road because I was "a fucking stupid clown". The incident leading to him falling off his bike was forgotten about once his culpability had been established.
I couldn't control myself any longer. As suddenly as the fool appeared on the floor beside me an urge swelled up inside me and I suddenly started laughing at him. Right in his contorted snarling face. It was clear he was losing the initiative. His undirected aggression was giving way to his embarrassment.
Lying would be unfair. I can't deny as I wound down the window I studied his body language, his lack of balance as he leaned all over my door. I Listened to him but didn't really process the words. I was already sizing up if and when and how I'd hit him first. Not out of spite but necessity if this man chose to keep escalating the situation. Interestingly as I spoke with him and tried to reason with him, pointing out the fact he was at fault for what was a small and inconsequential 'nearly-accident' he backed off. Choosing to insult me from further away instead.
To some of you I may sound worse than him, talking of striking first and hard if necessary. However the training and outlook I've been given is to make a preemptive strike if necessary. To do the right amount of damage to someone to protect yourself.
After the adrenaline, confusion and ludircrous nature of the incident had played out in my head back on my sofa, I began to smile. I realised my training had come into play and I had 'won' by "fighting without fighting" as the kung fu movies might say. I put my point across, clearly and defiantly. I was not intimidated and I was under control of my emotions at least outwardly throughout the confrontation. But even better than that I risked neither my health, the man's health nor my liberty by starting a fight or assaulting him. Nor did I give him the opportunity to do the same.
After realising I had been given no incentive "to step outside" in a classic duel way and that I was quite happy to get on with my life the man soon rode away, angry and upset. But instead of being baited by childish aggression and name calling I chose to let the man vent a little, come to terms with his mistakes and gave him the opportunity to move on.
Had I verbally or physically taken away his dignity, given him nothing else to lose then quickly I would have found myself fighting him and perhaps injuring one if not both of us. It was a very real and very out of the blue test of all I'd learned without throwing a single punch.
The real key as found in many philosophies is that it is possible to pick your battles and still win without going to war. That's what my training and pursuit of martial arts is all about. Being so good at reading and controlling a situation I should rarely need to use force.
He'd bolted up from behind me on the wrong side of the road, despite me being stationary and indicating to turn right he was incredulous as to how I'd dare to nearly knock him off a bike he was riding too fast, without a helmet and weaving around me, on my driver's side.
I wound down my window and immediately any concern I felt was met with aggression. Insults were traded and the posturing of "get out the car I want a word with you" soon followed. After pointing out the man was on the wrong side of the road sneaking up on my blindside he then decided he actually "wanted a word" with me because I had apparnetly "nearly put [him] in the kerb" somewhere vaguely down the road because I was "a fucking stupid clown". The incident leading to him falling off his bike was forgotten about once his culpability had been established.
I couldn't control myself any longer. As suddenly as the fool appeared on the floor beside me an urge swelled up inside me and I suddenly started laughing at him. Right in his contorted snarling face. It was clear he was losing the initiative. His undirected aggression was giving way to his embarrassment.
Lying would be unfair. I can't deny as I wound down the window I studied his body language, his lack of balance as he leaned all over my door. I Listened to him but didn't really process the words. I was already sizing up if and when and how I'd hit him first. Not out of spite but necessity if this man chose to keep escalating the situation. Interestingly as I spoke with him and tried to reason with him, pointing out the fact he was at fault for what was a small and inconsequential 'nearly-accident' he backed off. Choosing to insult me from further away instead.
To some of you I may sound worse than him, talking of striking first and hard if necessary. However the training and outlook I've been given is to make a preemptive strike if necessary. To do the right amount of damage to someone to protect yourself.
After the adrenaline, confusion and ludircrous nature of the incident had played out in my head back on my sofa, I began to smile. I realised my training had come into play and I had 'won' by "fighting without fighting" as the kung fu movies might say. I put my point across, clearly and defiantly. I was not intimidated and I was under control of my emotions at least outwardly throughout the confrontation. But even better than that I risked neither my health, the man's health nor my liberty by starting a fight or assaulting him. Nor did I give him the opportunity to do the same.
After realising I had been given no incentive "to step outside" in a classic duel way and that I was quite happy to get on with my life the man soon rode away, angry and upset. But instead of being baited by childish aggression and name calling I chose to let the man vent a little, come to terms with his mistakes and gave him the opportunity to move on.
Had I verbally or physically taken away his dignity, given him nothing else to lose then quickly I would have found myself fighting him and perhaps injuring one if not both of us. It was a very real and very out of the blue test of all I'd learned without throwing a single punch.
The real key as found in many philosophies is that it is possible to pick your battles and still win without going to war. That's what my training and pursuit of martial arts is all about. Being so good at reading and controlling a situation I should rarely need to use force.
While I've been away
Sun, Mar 27 2011 12:31
| free, offers, training, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
Some of you may have noticed we've been rather quiet of late. Well it's because we've been launching a whole new club for the benefit of the Altrincham community.
The press release below will tell you all you need to know.
Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) Announces Free Open Sessions for Local Residents
27th March 2011 – A New Martial Arts Club has launched in Altrincham and is offering a free open session for local people wishing to try out this exciting form of martial arts. Practised by many celebrities over the years including Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Cameron Diaz, Robert Downey jr and even Peter Andre have all studied the art to varying levels.
The open session will be held on Monday 4th April at the Broomwood Centre in Timperley, 6.30-8.30pm. The club is open to all ages and whether it's traditional martial arts know-how, basic self defence or getting fitter alongside dedicated and like-minded people, AMAC has something to offer everyone. Even better than that, for the whole of April and May you can get one week of free training. You can also claim 10 lessons for the price of 7 - saving you £30.
Altricham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) uses a form of martial arts called Wing Tsun Kung Fu, an extremely effective and sophisticated art from China. Wing Tsun's specialty is in close contact combat, it doesn’t involve throws, breakfalls, high kicks or hard contact punches and yet remains a practical and highly effective fighting style.
Head instructor Matt Townsend says “One of the great things about Wing Tsun is its accessibility: it’s suitable for men, women, young and old. We’re really keen to encourage people from the local community to come down and try out this exciting form of martial arts and that’s why we’re offering this free session”
He goes onto say “We’re also keen to work with local community groups in the area, previously we’ve run a self-defence course for a girls school in Withington, a women’s refuge in Chorlton and a youth scheme in Collyhurst. We would love to build up relationships in the Altrincham area and ask for any interested parties to get in touch.”
AMAC was established in 2008 and has gone from strength to strength, becoming a permanent fixture in Altrincham. Lead Instructor Matthew has studied Wing Tsun Kung Fu and other styles all over the world, including New Zealand and the USA, bringing years of experience and dedication to hundreds of people in Altrincham.
AMAC training sessions take place on Monday nights 18:30 – 20:30 at the Broomwood Centre,
Mainwood Road, Timperley, WA15 7JU and on Thursday nights 18:30 – 20:30 at the Town Hall, Market Street, Altrincham, WA14 1PG.
For more information on Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC), training sessions and community work contact Matthew Townsend on 07853 530886 or email matttownsend85@hotmail.com or visit www.amaclub.org.uk
Established in 2008 by Head Instructor Matt Townsend (1TG). Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) has been a permanent fixture ever since.
AMAC teaches Wing Tsun Kung Fu, an extremely effective and sophisticated art from China. Wing Tsun's specialty is in close contact combat: it doesn’t involve throws, breakfalls, high kicks or hard contact punches and yet remains a practical and highly effective fighting style. Wing Tsun is suitable for men and women, young and old.
Legend talks of two women who learned and systemised “Wing Chun” as a way for one of them to defeat a local bully. The focus has therefore always been on using an opponent’s strength and aggression against them, no matter how much bigger or stronger they are than you.
www.amaclub.org.uk
For More Information please contact –
Matthew Townsend
Head Instructor
http://www.amaclub.org.uk/
info@amaclub.org.uk
T: 07853 530886
The press release below will tell you all you need to know.
Altrincham Martial Arts Club Kick Starts into Action!
Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) Announces Free Open Sessions for Local Residents
27th March 2011 – A New Martial Arts Club has launched in Altrincham and is offering a free open session for local people wishing to try out this exciting form of martial arts. Practised by many celebrities over the years including Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Cameron Diaz, Robert Downey jr and even Peter Andre have all studied the art to varying levels.
The open session will be held on Monday 4th April at the Broomwood Centre in Timperley, 6.30-8.30pm. The club is open to all ages and whether it's traditional martial arts know-how, basic self defence or getting fitter alongside dedicated and like-minded people, AMAC has something to offer everyone. Even better than that, for the whole of April and May you can get one week of free training. You can also claim 10 lessons for the price of 7 - saving you £30.
Altricham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) uses a form of martial arts called Wing Tsun Kung Fu, an extremely effective and sophisticated art from China. Wing Tsun's specialty is in close contact combat, it doesn’t involve throws, breakfalls, high kicks or hard contact punches and yet remains a practical and highly effective fighting style.
Head instructor Matt Townsend says “One of the great things about Wing Tsun is its accessibility: it’s suitable for men, women, young and old. We’re really keen to encourage people from the local community to come down and try out this exciting form of martial arts and that’s why we’re offering this free session”
He goes onto say “We’re also keen to work with local community groups in the area, previously we’ve run a self-defence course for a girls school in Withington, a women’s refuge in Chorlton and a youth scheme in Collyhurst. We would love to build up relationships in the Altrincham area and ask for any interested parties to get in touch.”
AMAC was established in 2008 and has gone from strength to strength, becoming a permanent fixture in Altrincham. Lead Instructor Matthew has studied Wing Tsun Kung Fu and other styles all over the world, including New Zealand and the USA, bringing years of experience and dedication to hundreds of people in Altrincham.
AMAC training sessions take place on Monday nights 18:30 – 20:30 at the Broomwood Centre,
Mainwood Road, Timperley, WA15 7JU and on Thursday nights 18:30 – 20:30 at the Town Hall, Market Street, Altrincham, WA14 1PG.
For more information on Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC), training sessions and community work contact Matthew Townsend on 07853 530886 or email matttownsend85@hotmail.com or visit www.amaclub.org.uk
About Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC)
Established in 2008 by Head Instructor Matt Townsend (1TG). Altrincham Martial Arts Club (AMAC) has been a permanent fixture ever since.
AMAC teaches Wing Tsun Kung Fu, an extremely effective and sophisticated art from China. Wing Tsun's specialty is in close contact combat: it doesn’t involve throws, breakfalls, high kicks or hard contact punches and yet remains a practical and highly effective fighting style. Wing Tsun is suitable for men and women, young and old.
Legend talks of two women who learned and systemised “Wing Chun” as a way for one of them to defeat a local bully. The focus has therefore always been on using an opponent’s strength and aggression against them, no matter how much bigger or stronger they are than you.
www.amaclub.org.uk
For More Information please contact –
Matthew Townsend
Head Instructor
http://www.amaclub.org.uk/
info@amaclub.org.uk
T: 07853 530886
I do like Mondays
Sat, Feb 5 2011 08:37
| martial arts, training, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
In fact I like them a so much that we're opening up another whole night of training for the people of Altrincham and surrounding areas. Based at the magnificent facilities in the Broomwood Centre, Timperley (Broomwood Centre Map) we'll be running 2 hours of martial arts suitable for anyone and everyone.
For those who haven't popped down to see us yet there's no time like the present and no excuse! Whether it's one hour or four per week, every bit of training helps! For those who know us well then you can expect more of the same excellent Wing Tsun and self defence as well as the chance for more detail, better conditioning and a flexibility to your training schedule we've not had since the end of last year!
If you'd like more information please drop me or line or simply turn up on the night. Remember we still train every Thursday as always at the Town Hall on Market St. in Altrincham. Training is once again 6:30 - 8:30pm. We've also made training even cheaper allowing people to train from £2.80 per hour*!
Training costs (concessions in brackets):
2hrs per week - (£30) £40
4hrs per week - (£45) £55
PAYG - £5 per hour
There really is no excuse and no time like the present - spread the word!
For those who haven't popped down to see us yet there's no time like the present and no excuse! Whether it's one hour or four per week, every bit of training helps! For those who know us well then you can expect more of the same excellent Wing Tsun and self defence as well as the chance for more detail, better conditioning and a flexibility to your training schedule we've not had since the end of last year!
If you'd like more information please drop me or line or simply turn up on the night. Remember we still train every Thursday as always at the Town Hall on Market St. in Altrincham. Training is once again 6:30 - 8:30pm. We've also made training even cheaper allowing people to train from £2.80 per hour*!
Training costs (concessions in brackets):
2hrs per week - (£30) £40
4hrs per week - (£45) £55
PAYG - £5 per hour
There really is no excuse and no time like the present - spread the word!
*cost relates to a concessionary rate at 4hrs per week for four weeks in one calendar month (e.g. February)
National Seminar announcement
Thu, Nov 11 2010 09:25
| martial arts, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
It is my great pleasure to welcome back Dai-Sifu Richard Summers back to the north west, where he will deliver another fantastic seminar on Sunday 5th December in Manchester. Sifu Richard has been training in martial arts for over 30 years. As a private student of Grandmaster Keith Kernspecht, he has an amazing ability to take apart anybody who is put in front of him, and do it in a efficient, effective and powerful way, something I feel in every single lesson I have with him. We are fortunate enough to have two seminars a year with Sifu, and they are events which should not be missed.
Seminar Details:
Time: 11am - 5:30pm (1hr lunch)
Location:
Temple Gym
Trinity Sports Centre,
Cambridge Street,
Hulme ,
Manchester,
M15 6HP.
Content
The morning session will be on 'Ground Fighting' - this usually is a lot of fun!
We will break for lunch at 1pm - please bring a packed lunch as we have lunch time entertainment!
In the afternoon we will be covering 'Weapons' as well as preparing for an assessment which Sifu and I have organised. All students will do this assessment, and will receive their Student Grade 1 on passing this test if they have not received it previously. If you have already received your Student Grade 1 certificate, consider this a refresher!
To finish off the day, we will have a short presentation and a small Q&A session.
Finally, we are looking to book a buffet in Manchester city centre, please speak to your Instructor about more information on this one as we would like to take deposits for it.
Pricing
£30 for students
£35 for adults
If you have any other questions please speak to your instructor.
Hope to see you all there!
Ste Legassick
Northwest Regional Instructor
Seminar Details:
Time: 11am - 5:30pm (1hr lunch)
Location:
Temple Gym
Trinity Sports Centre,
Cambridge Street,
Hulme ,
Manchester,
M15 6HP.
Content
The morning session will be on 'Ground Fighting' - this usually is a lot of fun!
We will break for lunch at 1pm - please bring a packed lunch as we have lunch time entertainment!
In the afternoon we will be covering 'Weapons' as well as preparing for an assessment which Sifu and I have organised. All students will do this assessment, and will receive their Student Grade 1 on passing this test if they have not received it previously. If you have already received your Student Grade 1 certificate, consider this a refresher!
To finish off the day, we will have a short presentation and a small Q&A session.
Finally, we are looking to book a buffet in Manchester city centre, please speak to your Instructor about more information on this one as we would like to take deposits for it.
Pricing
£30 for students
£35 for adults
If you have any other questions please speak to your instructor.
Hope to see you all there!
Ste Legassick
Northwest Regional Instructor
KickStart Altrincham Price Restructure
Mon, Aug 23 2010 04:19
| martial arts, pricing, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
From September 2010 KickStart Altrincham will be expanding and getting even bigger and better. We will now be training on Mondays and Thursdays in two venues covering more of the area and reaching more people.
Monday nights training will be held at Kersal Rugby Club Timperley – 6:30 -8:30pm.
Thursday nights training will continue at Altrincham Town Hall, Market St. - 6:30-8:30pm
Some of you will know KS is no longer a commercial enterprise and is now dedicated to supplying top class self defence and Wing Tsun Kung Fu to Altrincham and beyond. With limited class sizes and a dedicated student body we aim to provide intensive tuition and progress to our members. By doubling class times we can offer even greater attention and progress to people and have flexible prices to reflect their needs.
For one session per week (2hrs) members pay only £40 pcm
For two sessions per week (4hrs) members pay only £65 pcm
Those with hectic schedules can choose the 'pay as you go' option of simply £5 per hour. Please note we also offer concessionary rates to the following people: Students, Emergency Services, Armed Forces and NHS workers all qualify.
For one session per week (2hrs) members pay only £30 pcm
For two sessions per week (4hrs) members pay only £50 pcm
KickStart are dedicated to inclusiveness, fair prices and preserving tradition martial arts alongside modern self defence concepts. We do not offer contracts or obligate anyone to terms and conditions of payment. Please ask for details. First sessions are ALWAYS absolutely FREE and you are under no obligation to join KickStart Martial Arts.
For all information and enquiries:
Kickstartaltrincham@googlemail.com
P: 07853 530886
Monday nights training will be held at Kersal Rugby Club Timperley – 6:30 -8:30pm.
Thursday nights training will continue at Altrincham Town Hall, Market St. - 6:30-8:30pm
Some of you will know KS is no longer a commercial enterprise and is now dedicated to supplying top class self defence and Wing Tsun Kung Fu to Altrincham and beyond. With limited class sizes and a dedicated student body we aim to provide intensive tuition and progress to our members. By doubling class times we can offer even greater attention and progress to people and have flexible prices to reflect their needs.
For one session per week (2hrs) members pay only £40 pcm
For two sessions per week (4hrs) members pay only £65 pcm
Those with hectic schedules can choose the 'pay as you go' option of simply £5 per hour. Please note we also offer concessionary rates to the following people: Students, Emergency Services, Armed Forces and NHS workers all qualify.
For one session per week (2hrs) members pay only £30 pcm
For two sessions per week (4hrs) members pay only £50 pcm
KickStart are dedicated to inclusiveness, fair prices and preserving tradition martial arts alongside modern self defence concepts. We do not offer contracts or obligate anyone to terms and conditions of payment. Please ask for details. First sessions are ALWAYS absolutely FREE and you are under no obligation to join KickStart Martial Arts.
For all information and enquiries:
Kickstartaltrincham@googlemail.com
P: 07853 530886
Here's the Kicker
Sat, Aug 7 2010 04:25
| MMA, martial arts, training, muay thai, fighting, technique, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, kickboxing, self defence
| Permalink
Ask anyone what they associate with martial arts and it won't take long for them to say, describe or even act out a roundhouse kick to the head! It is the iconic and most loved image from any chop sockey movie for most people. It's also the one attack students seem to fear or at least be the most wary of and for good reason. Anyone who can lift, aim and put power into a kick over 5ft off the floor has some skills. The main problem with it, is that anyone who knows what they are doing will probably never use it outside of competition.
It is something I can almost guarantee you won't be likely to face in a confrontation outside of training. The reason being is as a manoeuvre it is very risky, requires a lot of room and perfect timing to pull off well. As an opening gambit your opponent would have to be pretty brave, reckless or phenomenally good to try this one on you. In terms of shock and awe it can be a brilliant tactic and if it connects you're going to knock down and probably knock out your victim with it. The main disadvantage of it is that it relies on momentum and your assailant to barely move in the time it take to lift your foot off the floor and turn it in arc whilst raising it to the desired height. While this may be a matter of a second or two, ask yourself what you can do in a second or two to the opponent with his weight on one leg, his groin exposed and head often turned away from you – you'd be surprised.
This is often the main problem I face as a teacher. The lack of faith and belief in the art and their own skills often makes students reluctant to even try and stand up to a decent kick(er). My main principle in teaching kick defence is to demonstrate the need for range awareness. Kicks are long range attacks, the foot is the striking part of the attack and is pushed out to an extreme range of motion. The first port of call for a defender is to close the distance and to do that they must go forward – as the motto dictates 'when the way is clear, go forward!'.
This makes sense on two counts. Firstly the kicker is generating power in a circular motion this is a longer path than the straight line taken by the Wing Tsun exponent who moves towards the his attacker and tries to dominate the space yielded by the 'opening up' of the kicker. Secondly the force generated by the kicker whilst considerable is concentrated in the foot and lower limb. The closer the attacker moves to the source of the power (the kickers torso and standing leg) the easier they can dissipate the force which is simultaneously being sent 'past' them towards the kicker's foot. This is exactly the same as swing defence when you think about it.
The arrow step forward also ensures the WT student moves quickly, powerfully and with a low centre of gravity. Tipping and extenuating the spin of the kicking action dumping the kicker on his head on the floor. I always encourage students to master stepping in, dominating the kicker's balance and doing nothing more refined than using their hands to barge and push the kicker over. This allows the student to focus on using good tactics and concepts to beat the kicker and not fixate on specific techniques or the kicking leg which is rendered useless if the remaining 3/4s of the kicker's body is attacked well.
Once someone is confident with ploughing forward in the face of such an attack it is then we can introduce variations and techniques. Generally speaking if the kick is delivered above the waist (high kicks) then you should use your hands to deal with the kicking leg if necessary. If it is below the waist (low kicks) then legs should be used.
A high kick can be beaten taking a movement from section six of SNT. Sweeping the leg aside with a gwat sau, lifting it with a tok sau and stepping in and under the opponent, flips them onto their head and drives them into the floor. As an aside Muay Thai uses an almost identical move to slam the back of a boxers head onto the ropes to try and knock them out. Obviously with no ropes the impact of concrete from a much greater fall is one you might like to consider when dishing this technique out on your kicking assailant.
A low kick should be dealt with using your legs. As the motto says 'every step is a kick and every kick is a step'. Therefore the front foot stepping into the opponent can be used to attack not just their stance but their legs too with a kick. A stop kick to the standing leg will see the attacker crumple and buckle as all of their weight is taken from under them. Alternatively the thigh of the kicking leg can be stamped on using the stop kick. Both options require aggression, timing and accurate footwork to work but with a little practice they can be achievable. They are also highly effective due to the short and impacting way in which they attack a kicker. From here a falling attacker can easily be picked apart with follow ups either using strikes or kicks and stamps as the situation dictates.
Kicks are fairly high up in the syllabus because they require decent impulses from confident training partners. The students must also have a decent understanding and ability in WT to successfully pull off the defences and avoid injury for themselves and their partner. They are also not a pressing concern for those who are looking to learn self defence due to their rarity in street fights – for that reason I believe it is also a topic pushed higher up more for technical interest than necessity.
It is something I can almost guarantee you won't be likely to face in a confrontation outside of training. The reason being is as a manoeuvre it is very risky, requires a lot of room and perfect timing to pull off well. As an opening gambit your opponent would have to be pretty brave, reckless or phenomenally good to try this one on you. In terms of shock and awe it can be a brilliant tactic and if it connects you're going to knock down and probably knock out your victim with it. The main disadvantage of it is that it relies on momentum and your assailant to barely move in the time it take to lift your foot off the floor and turn it in arc whilst raising it to the desired height. While this may be a matter of a second or two, ask yourself what you can do in a second or two to the opponent with his weight on one leg, his groin exposed and head often turned away from you – you'd be surprised.
This is often the main problem I face as a teacher. The lack of faith and belief in the art and their own skills often makes students reluctant to even try and stand up to a decent kick(er). My main principle in teaching kick defence is to demonstrate the need for range awareness. Kicks are long range attacks, the foot is the striking part of the attack and is pushed out to an extreme range of motion. The first port of call for a defender is to close the distance and to do that they must go forward – as the motto dictates 'when the way is clear, go forward!'.
This makes sense on two counts. Firstly the kicker is generating power in a circular motion this is a longer path than the straight line taken by the Wing Tsun exponent who moves towards the his attacker and tries to dominate the space yielded by the 'opening up' of the kicker. Secondly the force generated by the kicker whilst considerable is concentrated in the foot and lower limb. The closer the attacker moves to the source of the power (the kickers torso and standing leg) the easier they can dissipate the force which is simultaneously being sent 'past' them towards the kicker's foot. This is exactly the same as swing defence when you think about it.
The arrow step forward also ensures the WT student moves quickly, powerfully and with a low centre of gravity. Tipping and extenuating the spin of the kicking action dumping the kicker on his head on the floor. I always encourage students to master stepping in, dominating the kicker's balance and doing nothing more refined than using their hands to barge and push the kicker over. This allows the student to focus on using good tactics and concepts to beat the kicker and not fixate on specific techniques or the kicking leg which is rendered useless if the remaining 3/4s of the kicker's body is attacked well.
Once someone is confident with ploughing forward in the face of such an attack it is then we can introduce variations and techniques. Generally speaking if the kick is delivered above the waist (high kicks) then you should use your hands to deal with the kicking leg if necessary. If it is below the waist (low kicks) then legs should be used.
A high kick can be beaten taking a movement from section six of SNT. Sweeping the leg aside with a gwat sau, lifting it with a tok sau and stepping in and under the opponent, flips them onto their head and drives them into the floor. As an aside Muay Thai uses an almost identical move to slam the back of a boxers head onto the ropes to try and knock them out. Obviously with no ropes the impact of concrete from a much greater fall is one you might like to consider when dishing this technique out on your kicking assailant.
A low kick should be dealt with using your legs. As the motto says 'every step is a kick and every kick is a step'. Therefore the front foot stepping into the opponent can be used to attack not just their stance but their legs too with a kick. A stop kick to the standing leg will see the attacker crumple and buckle as all of their weight is taken from under them. Alternatively the thigh of the kicking leg can be stamped on using the stop kick. Both options require aggression, timing and accurate footwork to work but with a little practice they can be achievable. They are also highly effective due to the short and impacting way in which they attack a kicker. From here a falling attacker can easily be picked apart with follow ups either using strikes or kicks and stamps as the situation dictates.
Kicks are fairly high up in the syllabus because they require decent impulses from confident training partners. The students must also have a decent understanding and ability in WT to successfully pull off the defences and avoid injury for themselves and their partner. They are also not a pressing concern for those who are looking to learn self defence due to their rarity in street fights – for that reason I believe it is also a topic pushed higher up more for technical interest than necessity.
Running Into Trouble
Sun, Jul 25 2010 10:46
| jogging, martial arts, knife crime, keep fit, exercise, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence, running
| Permalink
Jogging is perhaps the quintessential fitness activity. From young to old and across the sexes and spectrum of athletes the ability and need to be able to run is fundamental. As a survival need for primitive man to a social phenomena that became common place over a generation ago, the history of running is interesting.
Whether pounding the technological wonder of the treadmills in your local gym or doing what boxers call “road work” in the fresh air, the popularity of jogging as a weight loss activity, hobby and chance to meet other like-minded fitness fanatics the popularity of jogging seems to be as popular as ever.
However one of the biggest problems people face is the fact that sometimes the only places we can go for a run can be dangerous and problematic. If you are lucky enough to have a lovely big park near you and enjoy running you'll know how fantastic it can be as a way to escape the city for a bit. The danger only really comes when like all other everyday activities the daily run lets us slip into a comfort zone and drop into auto-pilot.
I've seen joggers swerve surprised and furious drivers like dazzled deer as they were high-stepping across a road or junction ipod blaring, head held high and adrenalin pumping. I've even found myself doing the headlight mambo on one or two occasions and given my allergy to cardio work, it shows how easy it is to forget your surroundings.
The other main danger to runners unfortunately is a small proportion of the general public. Being attacked is a serious danger to runners. As the activity often decrees a need for wide open spaces away from highly populated areas it can make running alone far riskier than it should be. Coupled with the fact that the focus needed to go anther mile, keep up the pace and use of music to drown out the outside world often runners can find themselves at the mercy of unscrupulous muggers and attackers.
Wearing expensive trainers, carrying sought after mp3 players and often carrying mobile phones or wallets runners can present themselves as a lycra-clad payday for the petty assailant and when there are trees and bushes to conceal them it can be very hazardous for the humble runner.
So what can you do to avoid this sort of unfortunate eventuality?
1. Don't run alone – a training partner not only makes you harder to get to but makes training fun
2. Only carry what you need – I only take my house key in a zipped or buttoned pocket
3. Ditch the ipod – White headphones especially scream “mug me” and you will be amazed how much more aware you are using your hearing
4. Try to run in sufficient light – if you can't reflective clothing and portable lights are a must
5. Know your route/area – don't go off exploring by yourself, know where you can get help, leave a park or attract attention and be clear where exactly you are going and if it is likely to be unsafe at all.
6. Take some classes – biased I may be but every runner could do with some idea of how to protect themselves. Countless police officers have told me how mugged runners report attackers “coming out of nowhere” when the reality is they weren't paying enough attention
It is sad indeed that people can't pursue their hobbies without any sort of fear and while the focus of this article, I would like to reassure people that the risks are small but not insignificant. It always good practice to inform people when and where you are going out and when you expect to be back. It also makes sense to invest in a decent and reputable self defence course now and again to keep your skills sharp.
Knowing how to recognise danger and at the very least break free from assailants can save a lot more than cancelling your cards or claiming for a new mobile, aside from the mental and emotional trauma of being a victim of crime.
Whether pounding the technological wonder of the treadmills in your local gym or doing what boxers call “road work” in the fresh air, the popularity of jogging as a weight loss activity, hobby and chance to meet other like-minded fitness fanatics the popularity of jogging seems to be as popular as ever.
However one of the biggest problems people face is the fact that sometimes the only places we can go for a run can be dangerous and problematic. If you are lucky enough to have a lovely big park near you and enjoy running you'll know how fantastic it can be as a way to escape the city for a bit. The danger only really comes when like all other everyday activities the daily run lets us slip into a comfort zone and drop into auto-pilot.
I've seen joggers swerve surprised and furious drivers like dazzled deer as they were high-stepping across a road or junction ipod blaring, head held high and adrenalin pumping. I've even found myself doing the headlight mambo on one or two occasions and given my allergy to cardio work, it shows how easy it is to forget your surroundings.
The other main danger to runners unfortunately is a small proportion of the general public. Being attacked is a serious danger to runners. As the activity often decrees a need for wide open spaces away from highly populated areas it can make running alone far riskier than it should be. Coupled with the fact that the focus needed to go anther mile, keep up the pace and use of music to drown out the outside world often runners can find themselves at the mercy of unscrupulous muggers and attackers.
Wearing expensive trainers, carrying sought after mp3 players and often carrying mobile phones or wallets runners can present themselves as a lycra-clad payday for the petty assailant and when there are trees and bushes to conceal them it can be very hazardous for the humble runner.
So what can you do to avoid this sort of unfortunate eventuality?
1. Don't run alone – a training partner not only makes you harder to get to but makes training fun
2. Only carry what you need – I only take my house key in a zipped or buttoned pocket
3. Ditch the ipod – White headphones especially scream “mug me” and you will be amazed how much more aware you are using your hearing
4. Try to run in sufficient light – if you can't reflective clothing and portable lights are a must
5. Know your route/area – don't go off exploring by yourself, know where you can get help, leave a park or attract attention and be clear where exactly you are going and if it is likely to be unsafe at all.
6. Take some classes – biased I may be but every runner could do with some idea of how to protect themselves. Countless police officers have told me how mugged runners report attackers “coming out of nowhere” when the reality is they weren't paying enough attention
It is sad indeed that people can't pursue their hobbies without any sort of fear and while the focus of this article, I would like to reassure people that the risks are small but not insignificant. It always good practice to inform people when and where you are going out and when you expect to be back. It also makes sense to invest in a decent and reputable self defence course now and again to keep your skills sharp.
Knowing how to recognise danger and at the very least break free from assailants can save a lot more than cancelling your cards or claiming for a new mobile, aside from the mental and emotional trauma of being a victim of crime.
Bats and Blades
Thu, Apr 29 2010 02:25
| kung fu, martial arts, knife crime, violence, martial arts Altrincham, weapons, self defence
| Permalink
Since man first stood upright you can bet one of the first tools he fashioned was not designed to gather mastery over mother nature but instead over fellow man. Weapons of all shapes, sizes, materials go back as far humans do pretty much. Life and society has been violent long before our species could express many other feelings or ideas.
As with the man's innate violence, our desire to survive and flourish have combined and combusted at regular intervals throughout our lives and the lives of our forebears. The knowledge and fear of weapons is as instinctive as it real for all of us.
For many the fear of a stranger taking a knife, bottle, bat, stick, hammer etc. or worse a firearm and using it against is widely acknowledged and sometimes discussed publicly. However our home is full of far worse weapons that are more likely to be used against us – unfortunately. Domestic violence and resultant deaths from kitchen knives, blunt objects even dumb bells in a current case in the news have wreaked serious harm and death on people in every day scenarios from people they know well.
One only has to look at the amount of gun related deaths in the USA to see that not all of them are the results of criminal activity or intent but often passionate and tragic accidents that wreck lives and families alike.
Most people spend months and years just learning to overcome simple punches to safely evade the deadly aspect of a knife or blunt instrument at the end of a person's arm takes much much longer. In all honesty such a holy grail as effective and risk free defence rarely exists. Even in more martial societies of feudal warriors and professional soldiers in days gone by; taking on an armed assailant without a weapon was an extreme scenario and rare event I'd wager.
I've had a knife produced on two occasions and both times I didn't fight back, in one case losing an insured phone and £10 was worth the embarrassment and probing questions of “but you're a kung fu teacher?” It helped me become more informed about myself and what I can and should do.
I always say to my students “fingers and internal organs are hard to replace” and that is my advice in general on this topic. Unless there is a real chance or instant where your life might lost then simply don't fight back. Why encourage or invite the loss of life or serious injury for the sake of material goods? The most frightening encounter was being cornered by two men when drunk who wanted to mug me. The knife wasn't produced until I floored one with a single punch. It was clear I escalated the situation in their minds and the deterrent of a knife was necessary for them.
Unless you are a soldier in a battle field you have no practical need to invite or deal with someone trying to stab you. So the majority of your training and anxiety should not be consumed by this scenario. It is rather fun messing about with plastic knives in training and seeing just what is possible and in your reach. I would say however the drunken brawler is by and large the most common and most dangerous predator for most of us.
Some students even ask about the practicalities of carrying a weapon of some sort themselves. I reject this out of hand. Apart from a rape alarm for women you should not need to live your life with such an accessory in my book. It also brings to mind the adage of “bringing a knife to a gun fight” think of the escalation I mentioned earlier and what that would do to petty thieves if they knew we were all concealing knives as well. Gun crime would become epidemic overnight or worse.
If push comes to shove and someone does produce a weapon my basic advice is this.
As with the man's innate violence, our desire to survive and flourish have combined and combusted at regular intervals throughout our lives and the lives of our forebears. The knowledge and fear of weapons is as instinctive as it real for all of us.
For many the fear of a stranger taking a knife, bottle, bat, stick, hammer etc. or worse a firearm and using it against is widely acknowledged and sometimes discussed publicly. However our home is full of far worse weapons that are more likely to be used against us – unfortunately. Domestic violence and resultant deaths from kitchen knives, blunt objects even dumb bells in a current case in the news have wreaked serious harm and death on people in every day scenarios from people they know well.
One only has to look at the amount of gun related deaths in the USA to see that not all of them are the results of criminal activity or intent but often passionate and tragic accidents that wreck lives and families alike.
However whenever I ask students particularly newer ones, to offer forward a self defence scenario they'd like to learn a solution for. 90% of the time the response is “how do I deal with a knife?”. Knife crime has been falling nationally, and sadly rising within inner city London this year. But people are genuinely (and rightly) scared of being stabbed by a stranger in the street for the sake of money/possessions.
It's a fear and notion easily preyed on by some less scrupulous “martial arts” experts who charge people decent sums of money for a weekend of “knife defence” and other such guff. Quite frankly they give us all a bad name.
Most people spend months and years just learning to overcome simple punches to safely evade the deadly aspect of a knife or blunt instrument at the end of a person's arm takes much much longer. In all honesty such a holy grail as effective and risk free defence rarely exists. Even in more martial societies of feudal warriors and professional soldiers in days gone by; taking on an armed assailant without a weapon was an extreme scenario and rare event I'd wager.
I've had a knife produced on two occasions and both times I didn't fight back, in one case losing an insured phone and £10 was worth the embarrassment and probing questions of “but you're a kung fu teacher?” It helped me become more informed about myself and what I can and should do.
I always say to my students “fingers and internal organs are hard to replace” and that is my advice in general on this topic. Unless there is a real chance or instant where your life might lost then simply don't fight back. Why encourage or invite the loss of life or serious injury for the sake of material goods? The most frightening encounter was being cornered by two men when drunk who wanted to mug me. The knife wasn't produced until I floored one with a single punch. It was clear I escalated the situation in their minds and the deterrent of a knife was necessary for them.
This is the reality more often than not. People using weapons often don't really know how and when to use them and therefore are unpredictable. In panic or uncertainty they can stab and slash wildly which means attempting a defence is nigh on impossible and very risky.
Some of you may be disappointed or upset by this view. However I ask you to consider how often you have or will face such a scenario? Really, think about it. When that time comes god forbid, it is much better to lose money than honour or much worse.Unless you are a soldier in a battle field you have no practical need to invite or deal with someone trying to stab you. So the majority of your training and anxiety should not be consumed by this scenario. It is rather fun messing about with plastic knives in training and seeing just what is possible and in your reach. I would say however the drunken brawler is by and large the most common and most dangerous predator for most of us.
Some students even ask about the practicalities of carrying a weapon of some sort themselves. I reject this out of hand. Apart from a rape alarm for women you should not need to live your life with such an accessory in my book. It also brings to mind the adage of “bringing a knife to a gun fight” think of the escalation I mentioned earlier and what that would do to petty thieves if they knew we were all concealing knives as well. Gun crime would become epidemic overnight or worse.
If push comes to shove and someone does produce a weapon my basic advice is this.
- Maintain space, use your environment to make a barrier between you and the weapon – a coat, a bar stool, fire extinguishers all have their uses.
- Make yourself SEEN and HEARD. Attract as much attention as possible so everyone is looking not at you but the idiot brandishing a broken bottle or blade towards you. These cowards will most likely flee if they feel easily identified and vulnerable.
- NEVER try to grab the weapon or put your hands near it. Pin the arm at the elbow if you absolutely have to and try to disable the attacker immediately by striking their face/groin or knees etc.
- Always throw the weapon away from you and the attacker. If you didn't bring it you're probably not ready to use it and it will hamper or distract you. Our hands do far more damage than we give them credit for.
- GET OUT and GET CLEAR as soon as possible. Quite simply run! If you're not there you can't get hurt.
Making it Work
Thu, Apr 1 2010 04:18
| kung fu, martial arts, muay thai, fighting, technique, Wing Tsun Kung fu, basic, martial arts Altrincham, sparring, kickboxing, self defence
| Permalink
It's been a while since I've posted due to technical problems, busy schedules and a few things to ponder of late. Recently at Altrincham we had the first session of our “fight club” intensive lesson as we call it. The point was not to be a vicious test of masculinity but to see where our skills fitted with more “combat” based contexts and to offer new ideas to students alongside some conditioning work.
I began by introducing the famous “jab cross” combination from boxing and it soon became clear that even badly executed versions at high speed were underestimated or taken for granted by people at first. However, it is the one attack even the most untrained of assailants tends to throw our way in degenerated forms of varying degrees, time after time.
The challenge of reading the opponent's body to ascertain timing, range and power is one that is challenging to even experienced students with sound technical knowledge and application of techniques and hand-shapes. What became apparent to all was a lesson I'd learned the hard way – having the knowledge, putting in the time and getting pak sau punch (a fundamental technique) to work wasn't as straight forward affair.
But with time and patience progress was clear. I found that often students who had a good knowledge and had repeated their basic footwork and hand-shapes coped much better. This was hardly a revelation to me – a lot of people I've studied have talked about the “elite” amongst them always had their basics nailed down.
The irony is that as students we often want to progress thinking that each new technique is better and more advanced than the last. However I would suggest that these new techniques are simply more specialised. They are designed for rarer and rarer scenarios.
What you will notice as you progress through the grades is that the first thing you are taught is to deal with 90% of attacks. The following years of training merely refine this idea and fills in the other 10% of knowledge.
This was demonstrated when I dedicated the last 45 minutes of the session to a baptism of fire for everyone present. Donning a body shield, helmet with mask, 14oz boxing loves, shin and groin guards I asked each man present to spar with me for 3 minutes. The others meanwhile were given the choice of calisthenics to fill their time and test their constitutions.
While the point wasn't to bully or cajole my students into accepting defeat, my aim was to pick up on their weaknesses or shortcomings and encourage them to face them. Whether that was backing off, standing still, covering up, resorting to grappling/boxing etc my aim was to get them to use their WT.
It was apparent when people succeeded they were confidently applying techniques and adaptations of them using theory we'd covered. With a range of experience and abilities it was impressive to note how much people could do after mere weeks of classes. I really do believe with focus and effort learning to “fight” and being proficient is possible after mere months. Beyond that point in your development it is the refining process of making techniques; sharper, harder, faster etc.
The way to do this is to rep the basics over and over and over until they become instinctive answers to the questions raised from assailants. The smoother and more effective these techniques become the better the results and the only way to acheive that is to condition your muscular and endocrine skeletons to perform these responses through constant practice of the most basic movements and ideas.
I began by introducing the famous “jab cross” combination from boxing and it soon became clear that even badly executed versions at high speed were underestimated or taken for granted by people at first. However, it is the one attack even the most untrained of assailants tends to throw our way in degenerated forms of varying degrees, time after time.
The challenge of reading the opponent's body to ascertain timing, range and power is one that is challenging to even experienced students with sound technical knowledge and application of techniques and hand-shapes. What became apparent to all was a lesson I'd learned the hard way – having the knowledge, putting in the time and getting pak sau punch (a fundamental technique) to work wasn't as straight forward affair.
But with time and patience progress was clear. I found that often students who had a good knowledge and had repeated their basic footwork and hand-shapes coped much better. This was hardly a revelation to me – a lot of people I've studied have talked about the “elite” amongst them always had their basics nailed down.
The irony is that as students we often want to progress thinking that each new technique is better and more advanced than the last. However I would suggest that these new techniques are simply more specialised. They are designed for rarer and rarer scenarios.
What you will notice as you progress through the grades is that the first thing you are taught is to deal with 90% of attacks. The following years of training merely refine this idea and fills in the other 10% of knowledge.
This was demonstrated when I dedicated the last 45 minutes of the session to a baptism of fire for everyone present. Donning a body shield, helmet with mask, 14oz boxing loves, shin and groin guards I asked each man present to spar with me for 3 minutes. The others meanwhile were given the choice of calisthenics to fill their time and test their constitutions.
While the point wasn't to bully or cajole my students into accepting defeat, my aim was to pick up on their weaknesses or shortcomings and encourage them to face them. Whether that was backing off, standing still, covering up, resorting to grappling/boxing etc my aim was to get them to use their WT.
It was apparent when people succeeded they were confidently applying techniques and adaptations of them using theory we'd covered. With a range of experience and abilities it was impressive to note how much people could do after mere weeks of classes. I really do believe with focus and effort learning to “fight” and being proficient is possible after mere months. Beyond that point in your development it is the refining process of making techniques; sharper, harder, faster etc.
The way to do this is to rep the basics over and over and over until they become instinctive answers to the questions raised from assailants. The smoother and more effective these techniques become the better the results and the only way to acheive that is to condition your muscular and endocrine skeletons to perform these responses through constant practice of the most basic movements and ideas.
Pulling the Trigger
Tue, Jan 19 2010 01:37
| strikes, martial arts, punching, boxing, hitting, exercise, Wing Tsun Kung fu, martial arts Altrincham, self defence
| Permalink
A little test I like to perform when a new student walks through the door is something very simple – a short question is all it takes “if you were going to hit me as hard as you can.....how would you do it?” Understandably this is sometimes followed with awkward shuffling and wringing of hands. It’s not an idea or a concept people are comfortable with, but if you turn up to a martial arts class it is very relevant I’d say.
Talk to any of the poor people that have to suffer my lessons and they’ll tell you many things, especially how I seem to say the same things again and again. One of my fundamental principles is to put someone out of action in as fewer hits as possible – preferably one.
A common myth or misconception is that to defeat someone you must hit them all over using as many different attacks and body parts as possible. I blame the movies for compounding this notion that a roundhouse kick to the face is as practical as it is cool. In truth what people really need is “point theory”.
I explain this theory with a simple rather sexist analogy. If I kick you in the balls (sorry ladies please use your empathy here) where is the last place in the world, you want me to strike you again? Yep. Square in the knackers is the right answer.
If I break your ribs with my first punch, why wouldn’t I keep hitting them and push the shards through your internal organs? It won’t take much, it’ll put you out of action, and I’ll get to walk away. If you cover the first wounded area then this will of course leave your head or another “hotspot” exposed.
It may seem obvious to you now, if you hadn’t considered it. But often this comes as a revelation to many. Perhaps they simply haven’t had the scenario or impulse to consider something so socially reprehensible, but as a martial artist it is essential to be honest and truthful about things no matter how stark or uncomfortable they may be.
One other thing of note from the question posed to new students about their “hardest punch” is the fact that 99% of people perform some form of boxing style straight. Often they pick their front hand, not the much more powerful cross with the support of the hips and added distance off of the back hand just to insult the question I asked a little more.
Usually this is because of a lack of confidence or fear of “doing it wrong” and is perfectly normal. However it also seems that people know boxers hit hard (bloody hard, as my head will attest to) and thus this must be the most powerful way a person can hit. Not entirely unreasonable but there is one major flaw with this truism.
Boxing is not natural, it is not innate it is a very powerful art and to punch correctly is a skill learned and practiced. You need the right co-ordination, timing and muscular input to make these punches work. Furthermore these strikes are not easily compatible with the stance, theories and practice of Wing Tsun. Teaching someone to box before they can even learn WT is no good. Although a person might find it handy it is not useful in their pursuit of kung fu or self defence.
What I give students is lovingly referred to as the “hammer blow”. Using the natural alignment of the body, gravity and momentum it is a devastating strike, easy to perform and completely intuitive. It is also high applicable as even a newbie can secure their opponent by grabbing them with their weak hand and pummelling them with this devastating move!
Take your strong hand and raise it above your head, fist clenched, make sure your feet are evenly spread and your weight distributed. Throw the arm down and forward allowing the arm to “whip” your fist into your target as if throwing a ball. At the same time drop your centre of gravity through the legs. Make contact through the base of your hand in line with the wrist and ulna in your forearm as if you were performing a chop with your fingers clenched.
Practice on a pad and you’ll soon feel the natural swing of the movement and the raw power behind it. Remember to drop through the legs or you waste so much potential force it is untrue. Once comfortable this can be practiced in the air and on pads to build strength and coordination. If you feel confident loop the hit back across the body as if performing a back-fist in a figure of eight motion. This increases the damage done and teaches great hand-eye coordination and offers very good exercise if performed vigorously for a few minutes.
The hammer blow and subsequent back fist offer two very deadly strikes that do not require raw power or muscle just some simple balance and willingness. Take five minutes of your time everyday and try them out on both hands, you’ll soon reap the martial and fitness rewards!
Talk to any of the poor people that have to suffer my lessons and they’ll tell you many things, especially how I seem to say the same things again and again. One of my fundamental principles is to put someone out of action in as fewer hits as possible – preferably one.
A common myth or misconception is that to defeat someone you must hit them all over using as many different attacks and body parts as possible. I blame the movies for compounding this notion that a roundhouse kick to the face is as practical as it is cool. In truth what people really need is “point theory”.
I explain this theory with a simple rather sexist analogy. If I kick you in the balls (sorry ladies please use your empathy here) where is the last place in the world, you want me to strike you again? Yep. Square in the knackers is the right answer.
If I break your ribs with my first punch, why wouldn’t I keep hitting them and push the shards through your internal organs? It won’t take much, it’ll put you out of action, and I’ll get to walk away. If you cover the first wounded area then this will of course leave your head or another “hotspot” exposed.
It may seem obvious to you now, if you hadn’t considered it. But often this comes as a revelation to many. Perhaps they simply haven’t had the scenario or impulse to consider something so socially reprehensible, but as a martial artist it is essential to be honest and truthful about things no matter how stark or uncomfortable they may be.
One other thing of note from the question posed to new students about their “hardest punch” is the fact that 99% of people perform some form of boxing style straight. Often they pick their front hand, not the much more powerful cross with the support of the hips and added distance off of the back hand just to insult the question I asked a little more.
Usually this is because of a lack of confidence or fear of “doing it wrong” and is perfectly normal. However it also seems that people know boxers hit hard (bloody hard, as my head will attest to) and thus this must be the most powerful way a person can hit. Not entirely unreasonable but there is one major flaw with this truism.
Boxing is not natural, it is not innate it is a very powerful art and to punch correctly is a skill learned and practiced. You need the right co-ordination, timing and muscular input to make these punches work. Furthermore these strikes are not easily compatible with the stance, theories and practice of Wing Tsun. Teaching someone to box before they can even learn WT is no good. Although a person might find it handy it is not useful in their pursuit of kung fu or self defence.
What I give students is lovingly referred to as the “hammer blow”. Using the natural alignment of the body, gravity and momentum it is a devastating strike, easy to perform and completely intuitive. It is also high applicable as even a newbie can secure their opponent by grabbing them with their weak hand and pummelling them with this devastating move!
Take your strong hand and raise it above your head, fist clenched, make sure your feet are evenly spread and your weight distributed. Throw the arm down and forward allowing the arm to “whip” your fist into your target as if throwing a ball. At the same time drop your centre of gravity through the legs. Make contact through the base of your hand in line with the wrist and ulna in your forearm as if you were performing a chop with your fingers clenched.
Practice on a pad and you’ll soon feel the natural swing of the movement and the raw power behind it. Remember to drop through the legs or you waste so much potential force it is untrue. Once comfortable this can be practiced in the air and on pads to build strength and coordination. If you feel confident loop the hit back across the body as if performing a back-fist in a figure of eight motion. This increases the damage done and teaches great hand-eye coordination and offers very good exercise if performed vigorously for a few minutes.
The hammer blow and subsequent back fist offer two very deadly strikes that do not require raw power or muscle just some simple balance and willingness. Take five minutes of your time everyday and try them out on both hands, you’ll soon reap the martial and fitness rewards!
A Sporting Chance
Wed, Dec 30 2009 02:22
| kung fu, martial arts, boxing, training, street fight, martial arts Altrincham, kickboxing, self defence
| Permalink
If you ask our old friend Joe Public to name a martial art you tend to receive a narrow set of answers. Karate, Judo, Tae Kwon Do, Kung Fu (a coverall for hundreds if not thousands of styles), perhaps even boxing or wrestling or global brands such as UFC might all get the nod.
So what? You might ask. The common thread is that by and large all of those are sports. They have rules, referees, specific types of strikes/ranges and weight classes etc they are not practiced, designed for or implemented on the most important arena of all – the street.
However if you talk to our friend Joe Public they will not see the difference and nor should we expect them to. What is even more worrying is when students or even worse instructors of these styles cannot differentiate the gulf between these two contexts.
I do not seek to defame any one of these pursuits or criticise them as styles of combat. However it does bother me that from a cultural point of view there is a complicit willingness to mislead or simply avoid the gap between the mat and the pavement.
It is not to say that the skills and techniques from any of these sports cannot be used for self defence but in my humble experience it is often a case that a certain amount of adaptation and understanding is needed to make this work.
How often do you hear stories of martial arts enthusiasts suffering horrific injuries and humiliation at the hands of thugs and criminals? What can possibly cause this? How does the highly trained exponent of a fighting style fall foul of the untrained?
The answer can be complex but generally speaking there is a combination of the following factors often enough:
· An overinflated confidence of the individuals own strength and skills
· A lack of exposure to self defence/street fights
· A fundamental flaw in understanding their styles strengths and weaknesses
· A basic lack of conditioning to physical, psychological and verbal assaults from unprovoked opponents
· An assumption that an attacker may fight fair or within a consensual set of rules/code
Violent and criminal acts are often borne out of base desires or instincts the perpetrators often utilise the deepest and most animalistic of methods and traits. Regularly these acts are malicious, opportunistic, instinctive and cruel in nature. In essence they go against every cornerstone of the sporting world and culture no matter how violent or barbaric a sport may seem to outside world (see much of the moral debate over boxing and increasingly MMA bouts).
It is this dichotomy that in my opinion often leads to confusion amongst the martial arts community as to the validity and more importantly relevance of various styles to practical street defence. In martial sports their design and motivation is to achieve as much parity between contestants as possible. Fighters are seeded, compete in weight classes and receive medical care and attention as well as the grace and attention of referees to protect their health as much as possible.
On the street there is no code, no starting bell, no one to separate pugilists and there is no reason for an attacker to stop maliciously beating a stricken foe and inflicting severe damage and even death using any strike, weapon or method they choose.
At this point you may be thinking I am seeking to dismiss and undermine martial sports as a glorified side show and spectacle. Far from it! I love to box and kick-box and would hate to trade blows with any well trained exponent of Muay Thai, MMA, wrestling etc
My participation in those pursuits however, isn’t designed to improve my effectiveness but to improve my basic martial skills. The test of stamina, fitness, muscle, coordination and balance I gain from kick-boxing all provide ample reason enough to train it. Most importantly though I simply enjoy it!
My underlining point is that often instructors fail their students by not differentiating between the dojo and the alley way. I have seen instructors of various martial sports claim an in depth knowledge of self defence and for it to be an area they teach extensively in their class without a hint of embarrassment of self-denial.
Often this is simply a marketing ploy as the instructor knows full well a novice will not be able to discern the difference or the fact and fiction of what they are told until many hours of training have been undertaken. The martial arts which are well renowned amongst experts and enthusiasts for a high level of usability are also linked to various military and police bodies. These arts include Wing Tsun, Krav Maga, Systema, Sambo and Eskrima amongst others.
This is no coincidence. The military and police deal with dangerous and deadly encounters as a matter of course. They need and rely on techniques not only to do their job but to stay alive as they have no margin for error.
My question to you is does your training cater for what you need over what you want? It is easy to dismiss one art or one teacher over another. However it is fundamental that you not only find a teacher you enjoy training with, but you find a teacher who can deliver what you require.
So what? You might ask. The common thread is that by and large all of those are sports. They have rules, referees, specific types of strikes/ranges and weight classes etc they are not practiced, designed for or implemented on the most important arena of all – the street.
However if you talk to our friend Joe Public they will not see the difference and nor should we expect them to. What is even more worrying is when students or even worse instructors of these styles cannot differentiate the gulf between these two contexts.
I do not seek to defame any one of these pursuits or criticise them as styles of combat. However it does bother me that from a cultural point of view there is a complicit willingness to mislead or simply avoid the gap between the mat and the pavement.
It is not to say that the skills and techniques from any of these sports cannot be used for self defence but in my humble experience it is often a case that a certain amount of adaptation and understanding is needed to make this work.
How often do you hear stories of martial arts enthusiasts suffering horrific injuries and humiliation at the hands of thugs and criminals? What can possibly cause this? How does the highly trained exponent of a fighting style fall foul of the untrained?
The answer can be complex but generally speaking there is a combination of the following factors often enough:
· An overinflated confidence of the individuals own strength and skills
· A lack of exposure to self defence/street fights
· A fundamental flaw in understanding their styles strengths and weaknesses
· A basic lack of conditioning to physical, psychological and verbal assaults from unprovoked opponents
· An assumption that an attacker may fight fair or within a consensual set of rules/code
Violent and criminal acts are often borne out of base desires or instincts the perpetrators often utilise the deepest and most animalistic of methods and traits. Regularly these acts are malicious, opportunistic, instinctive and cruel in nature. In essence they go against every cornerstone of the sporting world and culture no matter how violent or barbaric a sport may seem to outside world (see much of the moral debate over boxing and increasingly MMA bouts).
It is this dichotomy that in my opinion often leads to confusion amongst the martial arts community as to the validity and more importantly relevance of various styles to practical street defence. In martial sports their design and motivation is to achieve as much parity between contestants as possible. Fighters are seeded, compete in weight classes and receive medical care and attention as well as the grace and attention of referees to protect their health as much as possible.
On the street there is no code, no starting bell, no one to separate pugilists and there is no reason for an attacker to stop maliciously beating a stricken foe and inflicting severe damage and even death using any strike, weapon or method they choose.
At this point you may be thinking I am seeking to dismiss and undermine martial sports as a glorified side show and spectacle. Far from it! I love to box and kick-box and would hate to trade blows with any well trained exponent of Muay Thai, MMA, wrestling etc
My participation in those pursuits however, isn’t designed to improve my effectiveness but to improve my basic martial skills. The test of stamina, fitness, muscle, coordination and balance I gain from kick-boxing all provide ample reason enough to train it. Most importantly though I simply enjoy it!
My underlining point is that often instructors fail their students by not differentiating between the dojo and the alley way. I have seen instructors of various martial sports claim an in depth knowledge of self defence and for it to be an area they teach extensively in their class without a hint of embarrassment of self-denial.
Often this is simply a marketing ploy as the instructor knows full well a novice will not be able to discern the difference or the fact and fiction of what they are told until many hours of training have been undertaken. The martial arts which are well renowned amongst experts and enthusiasts for a high level of usability are also linked to various military and police bodies. These arts include Wing Tsun, Krav Maga, Systema, Sambo and Eskrima amongst others.
This is no coincidence. The military and police deal with dangerous and deadly encounters as a matter of course. They need and rely on techniques not only to do their job but to stay alive as they have no margin for error.
My question to you is does your training cater for what you need over what you want? It is easy to dismiss one art or one teacher over another. However it is fundamental that you not only find a teacher you enjoy training with, but you find a teacher who can deliver what you require.






